Today I contacted United Airlines to change a return flight on trip. The total came to $230 ($150 change fee and $80 difference between the price of my old and new ticket).
Fortunately, I checked on-line before making the call and saw that the one way trip on my new date was only $194. The agent and I both agreed that it made more sense (for me at least) to keep my old reservation and book the one way flight. I wondered why, at that point, United would choose to go with the process that was less cutomer friendly (me booking the one-way on line versus them changing the flight for the same price). The outcome would have turned out the same. Either way they would have $194. But, for some reason, they chose the business-centric rather than customer-centric response.
This was a clear lose/lose in my book. As a customer, United made it hard for me to do business with them. If I can book a one way flight for $194, why charge me $230 to do it? At that point, they already paid the sunk cost of the agent's time. It wasn't lke they were getting any process savings for me booking on-line.
But did they gain anything? I now have a reservation on two return flights and I am only going to use one. So their supply and demand planning is off. They have one less seat that they can sell for full price (and make a lot more than the incremental $40 they would have made by charging me $230). So, I think they lost too.
At some point, trying to squeeze every penny out of your customer backfires, especially when customers are in control and have other choices. It's one thing if there wasn't an on-line flight that cost less. But given the circumstances, it seems like they consciously chose to provide poor service.
United had the choice to be customer-centric. The outcome in this case didn't change. The only thing that changed was the process. And they chose a process that placed the burden on the customer without getting any actual benefit for themselves. Now why would anyone do that?